DFM Submission Checklist
Ensure a Complete, Accurate and Manufacturable PCB Submission
Purpose: Use this checklist to ensure all design data is submitted for a comprehensive DFM review. A complete DFM review identifies potential manufacturing issues before production and ensures a reliable and cost-effective build.
- Submit with all required manufacturing data.
- Answer all DFM review items accurately.
- Review manufacturer findings and actions.
- Approve DFM before authorising production.
| Section | Item | DFM Review Focus | Supplied | Critical | Major | Minor | N/A | Notes / Manufacturer Findings |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 copper features | 1.1 Minimum Track Width | Minimum achievable. | [ ] | [ ] | [ ] | [ ] | [ ] | |
| 1.2 Track Spacing | Minimum achievable. | [ ] | [ ] | [ ] | [ ] | [ ] | ||
| 1.3 Annular Rings | Minimum achievable. | [ ] | [ ] | [ ] | [ ] | [ ] | ||
| 1.4 Copper-to-Edge Clearance | Minimum achievable. | [ ] | [ ] | [ ] | [ ] | [ ] | ||
| 1.5 Acid Traps / Slivers | Reviewed and acceptable. | [ ] | [ ] | [ ] | [ ] | [ ] | ||
| 1.6 Copper Balance | Reviewed and acceptable. | [ ] | [ ] | [ ] | [ ] | [ ] | ||
| 1.7 Etch Compensation | Reviewed and acceptable. | [ ] | [ ] | [ ] | [ ] | [ ] | ||
| 1.8 CAM Modifications | Any CAM changes? | [ ] | [ ] | [ ] | [ ] | [ ] | ||
| 2 holes & vias | 2.1 Minimum Drill Size | As per capability. | [ ] | [ ] | [ ] | [ ] | [ ] | |
| 2.2 Aspect Ratio | Reviewed and acceptable. | [ ] | [ ] | [ ] | [ ] | [ ] | ||
| 2.3 Drill-to-Copper Clearance | Reviewed and acceptable. | [ ] | [ ] | [ ] | [ ] | [ ] | ||
| 2.4 PTH Plating Capability | Reviewed and acceptable. | [ ] | [ ] | [ ] | [ ] | [ ] | ||
| 2.5 Blind / Buried Vias | Reviewed and acceptable. | [ ] | [ ] | [ ] | [ ] | [ ] | ||
| 2.6 Microvias | Reviewed and acceptable. | [ ] | [ ] | [ ] | [ ] | [ ] | ||
| 2.7 Via-in-Pad | Reviewed and acceptable. | [ ] | [ ] | [ ] | [ ] | [ ] | ||
| 2.8 Filled / Capped Vias | Reviewed and acceptable. | [ ] | [ ] | [ ] | [ ] | [ ] | ||
| 2.9 Backdrilling | Reviewed and acceptable. | [ ] | [ ] | [ ] | [ ] | [ ] | ||
| 2.10 Press-fit Holes | Reviewed and acceptable. | [ ] | [ ] | [ ] | [ ] | [ ] | ||
| 3 stack-up & materials | 3.1 Stack-up Model | Achievable and acceptable. | [ ] | [ ] | [ ] | [ ] | [ ] | |
| 3.2 Material Availability | Available or substitute. | [ ] | [ ] | [ ] | [ ] | [ ] | ||
| 3.3 Core Material | Achievable. | [ ] | [ ] | [ ] | [ ] | [ ] | ||
| 3.4 Prepreg Material | Achievable. | [ ] | [ ] | [ ] | [ ] | [ ] | ||
| 3.5 Copper Weights | Achievable. | [ ] | [ ] | [ ] | [ ] | [ ] | ||
| 3.6 Board Thickness | Achievable. | [ ] | [ ] | [ ] | [ ] | [ ] | ||
| 3.7 Sequential Lamination | Lamination sequence acceptable. | [ ] | [ ] | [ ] | [ ] | [ ] | ||
| 3.8 Material Substitutions | Any proposed substitutes? | [ ] | [ ] | [ ] | [ ] | [ ] | ||
| 4 controlled impedance | 4.1 Impedance Targets | Within capability. | [ ] | [ ] | [ ] | [ ] | [ ] | |
| 4.2 Impedance Tolerance | As per specification. | [ ] | [ ] | [ ] | [ ] | [ ] | ||
| 4.3 Trace Width / Spacing | As per model. | [ ] | [ ] | [ ] | [ ] | [ ] | ||
| 4.4 Dielectric Thickness | As per model. | [ ] | [ ] | [ ] | [ ] | [ ] | ||
| 4.5 DK Used | As per model. | [ ] | [ ] | [ ] | [ ] | [ ] | ||
| 4.6 Coupon / TDR Test | Required / Reviewed. | [ ] | [ ] | [ ] | [ ] | [ ] | ||
| 5 finish, mask & legend | 5.1 Surface Finish | Within capability. | [ ] | [ ] | [ ] | [ ] | [ ] | |
| 5.2 Solder Mask Dams | Adequate. | [ ] | [ ] | [ ] | [ ] | [ ] | ||
| 5.3 Mask-to-Pad Registration | Acceptable. | [ ] | [ ] | [ ] | [ ] | [ ] | ||
| 5.4 Via Tenting / Filling | Acceptable. | [ ] | [ ] | [ ] | [ ] | [ ] | ||
| 5.5 Legend Clearance | Adequate. | [ ] | [ ] | [ ] | [ ] | [ ] | ||
| 5.6 Surface Finish Capability | Achievable. | [ ] | [ ] | [ ] | [ ] | [ ] | ||
| 5.7 Selective Plating | Reviewed. | [ ] | [ ] | [ ] | [ ] | [ ] | ||
| 5.8 Gold Fingers | Reviewed. | [ ] | [ ] | [ ] | [ ] | [ ] | ||
| 6 mechanical | 6.1 Board Outline | Reviewed and acceptable. | [ ] | [ ] | [ ] | [ ] | [ ] | |
| 6.2 Slots / Cut-outs | Reviewed. | [ ] | [ ] | [ ] | [ ] | [ ] | ||
| 6.3 Routing Tolerances | Within capability. | [ ] | [ ] | [ ] | [ ] | [ ] | ||
| 6.4 V-Score | Reviewed. | [ ] | [ ] | [ ] | [ ] | [ ] | ||
| 6.5 Castellations | Reviewed. | [ ] | [ ] | [ ] | [ ] | [ ] | ||
| 6.6 Bevels | If specified. | [ ] | [ ] | [ ] | [ ] | [ ] | ||
| 6.7 Countersinks | If specified. | [ ] | [ ] | [ ] | [ ] | [ ] | ||
| 7 panelisation & fabrication | 7.1 Panel Utilisation | Acceptable. | [ ] | [ ] | [ ] | [ ] | [ ] | |
| 7.2 Tooling Rails | Adequate. | [ ] | [ ] | [ ] | [ ] | [ ] | ||
| 7.3 Breakaway Tabs | Adequate. | [ ] | [ ] | [ ] | [ ] | [ ] | ||
| 7.4 Fiducials | Adequate. | [ ] | [ ] | [ ] | [ ] | [ ] | ||
| 7.5 Coupons | Included. | [ ] | [ ] | [ ] | [ ] | [ ] | ||
| 7.6 X-outs | Clearly marked. | [ ] | [ ] | [ ] | [ ] | [ ] | ||
| 7.7 Array Requirements | As specified. | [ ] | [ ] | [ ] | [ ] | [ ] | ||
| 8 special / high reliability | 8.1 IPC Class Requirement | Class 2 / Class 3 confirmed. | [ ] | [ ] | [ ] | [ ] | [ ] | |
| 8.2 HDI / Advanced Technology | Reviewed. | [ ] | [ ] | [ ] | [ ] | [ ] | ||
| 8.3 High Aspect Ratio | Within capability. | [ ] | [ ] | [ ] | [ ] | [ ] | ||
| 8.4 Heavy Copper | Within capability. | [ ] | [ ] | [ ] | [ ] | [ ] | ||
| 8.5 RF Materials | Within capability. | [ ] | [ ] | [ ] | [ ] | [ ] | ||
| 8.6 Controlled Depth | Within capability. | [ ] | [ ] | [ ] | [ ] | [ ] | ||
| 8.7 Special Testing | Available. | [ ] | [ ] | [ ] | [ ] | [ ] | ||
| 8.8 Microsection | Available. | [ ] | [ ] | [ ] | [ ] | [ ] |
9 DFM Findings Summary
| Item No. | Severity (Critical / Major / Minor) | DFM Finding / Recommendation | Design Change Required | Customer Action Required |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | ||||
| 2 | ||||
| 3 | ||||
| 4 | ||||
| 5 |
10 Manufacturer Declaration
We have reviewed the submitted data and confirm that we are capable of manufacturing this PCB according to the provided documents, drawings and requirements and have identified all DFM concerns, required changes, exceptions and proposed deviations prior to production.
- DFM reviewed by: _______________
- Date: _______________
- Position: _______________
- Department: _______________
DFM Acceptance: DFM accepted – Proceed to manufacture
- Approved By (Customer): _______________
- Date: _______________
DFM Rejection: DFM rejected – Customer action required
- Reason / Action Required: _______________
- Target Resolution Date: _______________
www.novatronic-pcb.co.za